Skip to content

THE ‘BHRAM’ WITHIN: ALL IN THE MIND

I have never been a huge fan of classical horror flicks; they freak me out.

Probably because, despite my earnest efforts, I have never been able to grow out of my childhood. Getting spooked by ghost stories were a large part of that experience. That apart, those highly synthetic B-Movie comic-capers that bootlegged as horror-films in my young adulthood never managed to excite me; at least not all of their aspects.

But ‘Bhram’ is different. It’s intelligent, and it involves you.

By intent, it’s a psychological thriller; while it takes you through a roller-coaster ride of all known (and some unknown) devices of sacrosanct ‘horror’ storytelling – but then you get to understand, slowly – that it’s ‘all in the mind’. That much I can live with.

No more spoilers. I genuinely relished the Zee 5 original, and binge-viewed it in one night – all eight episodes. For someone who couldn’t sit through even the first season of ‘Supernatural’ and broke off midway on the ‘Haunting of Hill House’ – that’s an achievement, for sure.

But yes, I did watch the ‘Mindhunter’; all of it. I loved ‘Sense 8’; and ‘Bhram’.

There’s a whole lot of reasons why I liked Bhram; the atmosphere, for one, in the foggy hills, somewhere near Chail; the exquisite camerawork that you can expect from a master-storyteller like Sangeeth Sivan; the eerie performance of Kalki Koechlin in the lead role as a grieving and seemingly haunted writer; the detail exposition of characters that keeps you connected to their fate; the spine-chilling music; and, of course, an intriguing story, where reality and illusions seamlessly merge, without designated borderlines.  

“HERE, YOU HAVE TIME TO EXPLORE THE CHARACTERS”

 

SANGEETH SIVAN, DIRECTOR

“This particular story idea we had developed for a film – in the first place. When we sat and talked about it, we realized that it could develop as a film – and we were quite confident about it – but somehow it never worked out.

Instead, Hari wrote the book, ‘The Other Side of Her’.

That’s a very personal thing – writing a book. But when we were turning this into a web-series – there were things that needed to be considered. Like the spread-over; twenty-five minutes each of eight episodes would be about 200 minutes. That’s over three hours of content. A normal film would be what – 90 to 120 minutes??

So we are talking about a much wider length that is required here.

The positive thing about this – in a web-series you have lots of time to explore the characters. You can optimally use the time-space; over eight episodes you can bring out certain things – that helps you create situations that keep people in the dark; you can position the time-frame – what happened when, and play around with it. You can’t possibly do all of that within the format of a book.”

By Hari, Sangeeth sir means K Harikumar, the young, talented writer who scripted the screenplay and wrote the dialogues for the web-series. This is in fact his second screenplay outing in the genre. He co-wrote the Malayalam film ‘E’ (2017), which was produced by Sangeeth Sivan and Amin Surani.

That apart, now acknowledged as one of the top horror writers of India, Hari has penned down four bestselling books in eight years. His latest book got launched in Asia’s biggest Paranormal Convention ‘Scarecon’ – that’s big time.

Hari sure knows how to spook his audience across multimedia; there’s absolutely no ‘Bhram’ there.

Hari’s latest book has short stories based on real, spooky places across India… fifty of them…

I contacted Hari through Sangeeth Sir – and he took me through his perspective of the plotting-logic and character-creation for the series.

“FEED WHAT YOU NEED”

 

K HARIKUMAR, SCREENWRITER

“First and foremost, you need to have characters that are fighting against their inner demons even before she proceeds towards her actual conflict in the story.

For example, Kalki’s character, Alisha Khanna (Revati Krishna in the book) is recovering from an accident in which she lost her unborn baby and husband. This would probably be one of the most horrific situations to put a person; audience would also agree.

Similarly, you have a priest who is flagellating himself; but why?

It is up to us how we need audience’s reactions to be- one of sympathy or suspicion. Feed what you need. You can use these characters as a red herring or such literary device. It is important to seed the minutest of the details in the exposition.

Once you have such characters, you need narrative hooks that capture the audience right when the episode begins. For me, the cold open of The Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown’s book as well as the Ron Howard movie) remains one of the best hooks in recent times.

Originally, our idea was to start the first episode with a murder in the woods but eventually we went with a car crash.

A cliff-hanger for every episode is very much preferred.”

Sangeeth Sivan and K Harikumar on the sets of Bhram, deep in discussion…

To compare, I bought his original book and read it.

There are definitely significant departures in the story-line between the two mediums. New characters have been introduced, there are fresh plot-twists and even the existing characters are more fleshed out. The entire location has changed from Kerala to Himachal, for that matter.

I felt Hari and Sangeeth sir have made it more layered in its web-series avatar – which helps enrich the viewing experience.

“A WEB-SERIES IS ALL ABOUT CURIOSITY”

 

SANGEETH SIVAN, DIRECTOR

” Look I think a web-series is all about curiosity. People start thinking – why is it there, why is he doing this, why is this happening and all that!!

We need not immediately explain everything.

I’ll give you an example. You find this disheveled character right in the beginning of Bhram saying ‘I know you will come back’ – now who the heck is he? Why is he saying – and what is he referring to?  As a viewer you are constantly thinking – why did he say that? So in your mind you are already working out a story around that character.

Now it need not be what the real story is – that is the ‘fun’ in it.

When you lead the audience to think in a particular direction – and then you say, no, this is actually not what you think – it’s something totally different from your perception. That’s how you get the people ‘hooked’.

And then, as you reach the climax – you have all those things to tie up. It’s very easy to create these ‘hooks’ and seed those ‘suspicions’ – but then, to tie it up correctly till the very end is the issue.

That is where the skill comes in actually. It should be justified.

See the problem with these web-series is – you get people so immersed in the character and the story till say the seventh episode of an eight part series, and then suddenly at the eighth you have to justify all that.

Otherwise people will say – oh hell yaar, I spent 200 odd minutes – for this crap!!!

It is tricky …you know.”

That’s true. The axiom that the end should justify the means stands all the more true in psychological thrillers. You just can’t leave the audience hanging midway.

Also, expansive characterisation doesn’t mean that you bring in extra characters just like that. Their stories should converge into the main-text of the protagonist – or else the audience might get disengaged.

In a thriller, once you lose their taut attention, all is lost.

“ALL CHARACTERS SHOULD LINK TO THE PROTAGONIST’S GOAL”

 

K HARIKUMAR, SCREENWRITER

“In my personal opinion- a book or a film is usually about the protagonist; and we kind of stick to that character.

On the other hand, a web series gives an opportunity to explore the character’s universe.

Everyone (mostly) loved Baahubali – The Conclusion. The film was all about that character. However, a web series could explore the lives of the Mahishmati kingdom or a secondary character like Sivagami.

Having said that, the web series would also revolve around the protagonist and each of these characters should serve a purpose and help towards fulfilling the protagonist’s goal/conflict in some way, otherwise it will be all over the place. If there is a gun in the first episode then it should be fired in the next (attributing this to Anton Chekhov).

Like Yaqub’s father was there as the man who was drastically affected by the injustice met out to his son. However, his placement in a clichéd opening scene makes the mind believe that there is a ghost or maybe Alisha is going to a haunted house.

It is like, “Hey! Here is a cliché. I am telling you she is possessed, coz I saw it in that movie too”, and that’s exactly how I want the audience to think when they watch the episode.”

So, if I understand it right, those ‘horror’ inciting scenes and the psychedelic ‘viewings’ of Ayesha Khanna (the character played by Kalki Koechlin), were actually instruments used to mislead the viewer. Or, maybe I should say, to lead them towards a specific direction. When they were dead sure that this woman is ‘possessed’ or at the best ‘crazy’ – the confusion clears, bit by bit.

By then, six episodes have gone by; or almost seven – out of eight.

“SHE IS PIECING TOGETHER A PUZZLE OF THE MIND”

 

SANGEETH SIVAN, DIRECTOR

“What attracted me to the premise of this series was its ambiguity? Is it a horror flick? Is it a reincarnation kind of thing happening? So you keep on confusing the audience and then you come to the point that – no, it’s all in the mind.

See the mind is a most complex thing – it can conjure up stories that need not be the reality at all. It can be total fantasy-land; it can be completely weird.  

For me, the striking point of Bhram was where the protagonist realizes – ‘I have seen all these characters before; when I had the accident, my memories got scattered and my brain couldn’t make the connection.’

So everything is in there in her neurons but they are not in a linear sequence.

What she is doing here is – she is trying to piece together a puzzle of the mind. I was really intrigued by that process – of her collecting bits and pieces of her own memories and solving the riddle.

It’s her mind planting illusions. That’s why the title – Bhram is illusion.”

That’s Hari discussing the script with Bhumika Chawla, on the sets of ‘Bhram’

At this point, I thought it was time to ask Hari about how he structures his scripts; all of us have different ways of doing that. Me, for instance, always write a larger piece first, at one go – and then chisel it down.

But I don’t write books and I am not a regular in feature screenplays either – so it’s always nice to gather some practical advice from someone who does both.

“I DECIDE THE BEGINNING AND THE END FIRST”

 

K HARIKUMAR, SCREENWRITER

“While writing a book, I follow this rule; Decide the beginning and the end first. I apply this to everything I write; including the fifty short stories that I wrote in India’s Most Haunted: Tales of Terrifying Places. It makes the path defined. The path taken seldom changes the pre-determined end.

When it comes to adapting a book to screen (for the web), we already have a set-story, you just have to choose breakpoints for each episode from the story, and then apply the rule all-over again (into each episode).”

That does seem a bit regimented, doesn’t it?

But please do not worry my young readers and aspiring writers. In the arena of creativity, rules are expected to be broken; but yes, to rise above conventions, we have to learn them first. There’s no easy way-out there.

“TAKE LIBERTY TO BREAK RULES”

 

K HARIKUMAR, SCREENWRITER

“Having a hook at the end of each episode is an individual’s choice. I try to put myself on a viewer’s place objectively. Not all shows/stories follow rules, and we can always take the liberty to break them.

And yes, when you have an experienced filmmaker like Sangeeth Sivan (sir) helming the ship, you can definitely take liberties with more confidence.”

 

The series has a number of sub-plots – that enhances its layering.

Many of them were not in the book, like the Alfie-Meera affair, or the third friend in the fray played by Eijaz Khan, or the steamy Mrs Saini’s sexual escapades…it’s a large list.

Hari told me that there were a lot more of these sub-texts, and, I quote him, “… each sub-plot needs to have a purpose (some vaporized in post-production)”

Out of all these diversions, what intrigued me the most was a quantum shift in the motive of the villain – who prowled the forests and killed under the costume of a tribal demi-god, named Ukala.

A screenshot of Ukala, the tribal demi-god and the protector of the forest…

Remember, I saw the series first, and then read the book. Nothing like Ukala was there in the book. The way this demi-god character has been developed and expanded in the series is fascinating.

There must have been a definitive reason to give a tribal mythos so much of screen space.

“THE TRIBAL VILLAIN IS AN ALLEGORY”

 

SANGEETH SIVAN, DIRECTOR

“ I don’t know how many people actually got it – but you see there is an allegory there in this whole thing about bringing in that tribal sub-text.

When you see Ukala you see him as a villain; but for me Ukala also means – he is the protector of the environment.

All sorts of evil frequent our forests nowadays – it’s not just about a few young boys and girls having sex in the cabins, but much more severe things are happening. Trees are being cut randomly; people are putting in too much plastic there – all sorts of things that damage the forest ecosystem.

For the tribes – the forests are their houses, their residences. You are actually willfully and systematically eating into their space. So at some point there’s going to be a reaction. So next time you go cut a tree, maybe you will get chopped.

There’s an end to everyone’s patience – isn’t it?”

Yes, I can’t help but agree to that, Sangeeth Sir.

There are limits, and we are way past them. Not just in the forests though. The tribe of humans everywhere are suffering from unwarranted intrusions – some of them with masks and sticks, some with drones and yet others with honey-glazed illusions, astride their media-chariots.

Anyways, forget it. Try and be tolerant, and stay alive. I am trying that too.

This one is lifted from Sangeeth Sir’s facebook page…that’s immediately after the shoot schedule completed.

Last but not the least, lets accept – horror is a genre that will find many takers in today’s India. For me, it keeps my mind away from the horrors outside. I am sure you will find your own reasons. There’s plenty of them.

So for those of you who swear by the potential of intelligent horror as a mode of purgation, and like K Harikumar’s work, I have a pdf file of his complete interview.

To download it as a keepsake, just click HERE.

Please follow and like:
Published inVIEWS

3 Comments

  1. Gautam Bandyopadhyay Gautam Bandyopadhyay

    Very interesting… The onlooker-kind of narrative adds pleasure to the reading experience

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram