Skip to content

KUMARARAJA: MASTERING THE “MULTIPLE” STORY-LINE

It does seem a bit odd to write a piece on a film that I consider to be a cult-classic even while the cinema halls are closed, and the nation is under a lockdown. While that’s true, certain things can’t wait, like anniversaries.

Let’s revise a old snippet of wisdom a bit then. Instead of saying the show must go on, we tweak it a bit and say – the shows that could go on, should go on.

This is the one year anniversary week of Thiagarajan Kumararaja’s Super Deluxe. It released on 29 March, 2019. I am sure, like me, most of you who have seen the film ended up excliming WTF did I just see?

This post is dedicated to them.

This is also to say, if you have not watched the film, then it’s no use reading this. Thanks for coming, but please first go watch it – on youtube, Google Play or Netflix.

Ever since Tapas Nayak, the well-known Sound Artist based out of Chennai (he mixed the sound of Super Deluxe) pointed my attention towards this film, during the course of a blog I did with him, I had been itching to write about it.

The film, an amazing maze of inter-linked stories that doesn’t quite fit into a single genre, did sweep me off-my-feet through its totally irreverent craziness and deliciously cerebral grey-humor – not to mention its almost fanatical sense of detailing, and impeccable sense of design. 

Thankfully, it’s maverick director Kumararaja obliged me, recently, with a whole lot of inside stories and ‘making’ tips, largely from a screenwriting perspective.  In this post, I  will cut my own crap, and let him do most of the talking.

To start with, I asked him, what inspires him to create films with interlinked story-lines.

MULTIPLE STORY-LINES HAVE A SCOPE TO BE GRAND

 

Interlinked stories or multiple story lines has been a genre of special interest to me.

It’s primarily because you can have lot of characters and there’s enough space to have instant changes in gear. If you have one story, it can move one step ahead at a time.

But multiple story lines, because you are cutting from one story to another, you can shift moods of a film – like crazily.

It kind of puts you on a roller coaster, that’s the idea. 

Also, multiple story lines have a kind of unpredictability about it. I mean a story with a single thread can go in kind of a defined direction; it can’t have too much of a radical change of direction. But multiple story lines have that quality – where one track influences the other track, moving the entire narration to a new space.

That kind of unpredictability is very exciting as a writer – or as an audience.

Also, multiple story lines have a scope to be grand. When I say grand I do not mean it in an economical sense, but I mean grandeur in terms of drama.

Like Kumararaja, I am a big fan of multiple story-line movies, or what some critics call hyperlink cinema.

Simply speaking, it’s a form of narrative storytelling that uses independent but interlinked stories – when characters and incidents from one story influences the other. Together they create what we might call a singular ecosystem or a ‘world’ of stories.

Some good examples of such films that I have seen from International cinema is Tarntino’s ‘Pulp Fiction’ (1994), a couple of films by Robert Altman including ‘Short Cuts’ (1993) – which is my personal favourite. Another film that I have seen and that I think falls within this category is a Brazilian Crime Film – ‘City of God’ (2002).

Kumararaja agrees – there has been many indirect influences, and much of it is largely from local Tamil cinema traditions.

WHEN YOU LIKE SOMETHING, IT FINDS ITS WAY IN YOUR WORK

 

Yes, there happens to be quite a lot of influences.

We have plenty of films in Tamil, but it used to be very different in those days.

It was probably about a family, and the characters inside a family, about having their own issues to sort and how that culminates into one big drama, and about how one person’s need affects the other person’s need – or enables this person’s achievements, or inability to achieve something. I mean, how one person’s actions affects another person’s destiny, and stuff like that; but it was all connected at the center.

Later, I think from there we evolved, to where we came a few years ago. Those were tracks that were seemingly disconnected, but they all came together at the end.

Super Deluxe is a film where tracks don’t come together. They start off differently; some start off as one and become two; some start off as two different things and emerge somewhere midway; and one story crisscross the other story at some part -and so on.

That way I think it gives you a variety, not necessarily coming together at the end like my previous film ‘Aranya Kandam.’

There have been international influences also.

I think ‘Pulp Fiction’ is a huge influence – I think anybody who likes good cinema will be influenced by pulp. That goes without saying. It has affected me as a film-maker even before I made Aranya Kandam or Super Deluxe for that matter.

It’s not direct, but you know – when you like something, it finds its way in your writing or your film-making, or something – it just has a good effect on you.   

The film Kumararaja mentioned, Aranya Kandam, was his debut feature film, released in 2011. Widely considered a cult classic now and often regarded to be Tamil Cinema’s first Neo-Noir film – it had a tooth and claw fight with the local censor board and had to be approved via a tribunal at Delhi.

Even after it released, despite being widely acclaimed critically, Aranya Kandam didn’t perform that well at the box-office. I read an interview of Kumararaja where he said, “No one’s seen it, so everyone thinks it’s a good film.”

Thereby I should consider myself fortunate, since I did get to see the film, courtesy Kumararaja’s personal copy. And, I do think it’s a good film.

Aranya Kandam might have its snags, but it does show what interlinked story lines can achieve. I believe those six quirky characters in that film and the time they spend among themselves was an early seed of the storytelling style – which Super Deluxe took to a whole new level.

The simultaneous storytelling that’s the hallmark of these films, however, is different from the genre where stories are told one after the other.  I am talking about films like ‘Dus Kahaniyan’ (2007) or ‘Bombay Talkies’ (2013).

Super Deluxe is nothing like them.  

NOT A BIG FAN OF ANTHOLOGY FILMS

 

I personally don’t like tracks that are separate. Not a big fan of anthology.

By anthology films I mean films that have many stories, but one gets over and then the other one starts, and that goes on. I am not a big fan of that style because I think it doesn’t have the kind of rush that this one has – where the film cuts from one scene in one story to another scene from another story.

You have a nice mood variation – in this kind of storytelling.

In the previous one, the anthology style, it’s more like a linear story; it’s just that we have three four linear stories told one after the other. Though there might be characters coming from one to the other and playing parts in two three different stories – that is not very exciting for me, as an audience. There might be few movies that are very good, but I am not a big fan of that style.

In Tamil, we had a film called Thiruvilaiyadal – which had more of an episodic structure. I used to like that, and I still like the film. It’s a mythology; there were other mythological films that had similar kind of quality – like Navagraha Nayagi had this quality where we had nine stories about the deity.

So these are a few examples, local examples.      

 

Re-watch this once before you go ahead …it will set your mood for sure.

In this post, I will majorly focus on elements of scripting of Super Deluxe.

Like I said, there’s were four writers involved with the screenplay – each one of them also directed their own segment. They are pretty well known names in Tamil Cinema, each with a distinct style of his own.

While Nalan Kumarasamy, the crtically acclaimed and box-office success Writer/ Director, is well known for his impeccable comic timing,  Neelan K. Sekar is seasoned player, with acclaimed expertise in the thriller genre; Mysskin, on the other hand, is a multi-talented writer/director particularly well known for his innovative and unconventional mis-en-scene. The fourth writer was Kumararaja himself.  

It only seemed logical to find out how Kumararaja managed to handle such a diversely talented team and come up with such an unique movie – despite each of them having their distinct style of writing, visualizing and treating cinema.

EACH ONE HAD IT DIFFERENT

 

The main writers, I mean the other three writers and me, we all had different ways of doing it. Each one had it different.

The script was developed before we could go to the characters and the actors.

For some scenes I had the details – like I had the beginning part of all the stories, I had the end of certain stories – but the rest was given at different stages with different people. With Nalan, it had a few scenes initially, including a key important scene where the story takes off and the climax.

With Neelan, on the other hand, I only had the beginning. I said well this is how the film starts, but I have no idea where the film would go; you can take it wherever you want to, but, eventually, this has to be the change in character – like this is the emotional change that needs to happen.

He just took it like that. I had only given 5 or 7% of the initial part and then 3% towards the end – the rest was all filmed by Neelan.

With Mysskin I think I kind of had a beginning – and I think that’s it. I said that somewhere around three-fourths of the narrative this is where we arrive, and you can just leave it there, you need not write the ending, I will write the ending.

I just gave it to them like that.

Once they had finished writing, I took all the three stories, and also one of the tracks that that I had written and kind of made everything part of one world. This was like kind of bringing the characters close to each other, in terms of tone and rhythm, and tried to make the character’s behavior not too far away from how I would treat them.

So that even if it was Mysskin who has a very different style of writing, or Neelan who has a completely different style of writing – I brought them very close to how I would probably develop those characters.

Nalan is anyway very close to how I would generally write. So with him I had to do very very minimal changes here and there, and it was put in place with ease.

 

Like Kumararaja said, he collated the ‘tracks’ to create a world within which all the characters exist. This means, to make this ‘world’ credible, at some point of time, there has to be points of intersections, where the characters meet. Or even if they don’t, what one set of character does have to have an impact on the other set, and that needs to be conveyed to the audience.  

That’s the fun of multiple storyline films.

There are four stories happening simultaneously in the film, but not necessarily in the same timeline. It’s not a single day film. I created individual timelines for each story and calculated – there are at least two days involved here.

The events that happen with the transgender father and his son are from a day before the rest of the events, if my calculations are right. That also explains the presence of Berlin, the lusty cop, playing a major role in two storylines.

Since you have seen the film, you already know the four tracks.

Let’s recap anyways. The first track starts with a wife that has extra-marital sex with her former lover and, in the process, finds him dead in her own bed, and spends the day trying to dispose the body with help from her husband.

Then there is this father who returns home as a transgender, and tries to revive the bond with his estranged wife and son.

One of the many scenes where I was transfixed to the scene … neither too serious, nor too frivolous, that’s the tonality of the entire film.

We also have this group of boys that start watching a porn film only to find one of their mothers featuring in it.  

The boy’s story then splits into two tracks.

In the first, the son of the porn-actress breaks his friend’s home TV in a fit of rage, and accidentally stabs himself with a screw driver while trying to kill his mom, and then gets entangled between his mother and father – who is a miracle healer.

In the second track, the other boys run from pillar to post to find money, in order to replace the broken TV, get involved with a local don, takes up a murder contract but fails and ends up even meeting an alien that clones one of them and keeps him as a partner.

Just as an aside, I love the moment where the alien girl asks the confounded boys, “So did you think aliens only landed in the USA?” 

The alien was a delight to watch, both with and without clothes …

The film is loaded with such delightful quips.

In the process of this totally mind-sucking spate of events, not all of which I can mention here, characters appear across story-lines, events criss-cross and motives intermingle like nobody’s business.

That’s how and why Super Deluxe feels like ‘one’ film, all the way.

It never feels disjoint and always feels fun, while challenging the limits of our imagination with its barrage of ROFL moments . I think it becomes such a giddy yet pleasant joyride due to the carefully construed character/plot inter-cuts that unifies the narrative. The last time I had this much fun was when I was reading the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

I thought, from a writer’s outlook, it should be exciting to find out how Kumararaja arrived at those points of intersection – where characters from diverse stories meet each other ? How did he weave-in those plot spillovers?  

Was all of this planned and done at the scripting stage?

INTERLINKING HAPPENED ALL ALONG

 

The stories were written independently.

We had certain characters and we had certain problems that the characters are facing – and how they overcome the problems. And then you decide on how they can influence the other story; and you also start deciding on which character can move on to the other story, how they can affect the other story.

But it is not always strictly like this.

Sometimes you think of one story, and then when you start thinking of the other story, even before you finish the second story, you can think of some characters coming here from the first story. So you probably start putting those characters as you are writing the second story. Not necessarily waiting for the stories to get finished – and then think of the characters to overlap, or the situations to overlap.

Sometimes, even when we finish shooting one story; because we shot like that, we finish one story and move to the other story and move to the next story and move on to the next one. So while we finish shooting one track, we continue to think.

I mean, that’s how it happened, where we thought that it will be interesting to have certain sequences from the next story to take place in the same location as the previous story.

Like Mugil and Vaembu, when they are hungry they go to the same place where the boys poison the tea. In terms of time, it’s not the same moment. But the fact that they will go to the same place was decided before we shot both the tracks.

We had a shot which was not used in the film – there was one shot where Mugil and Vaembu are sitting inside the car – where you see them from behind, but you see the guy with the tea glass walking in the foreground, crossing the frame, or the field – between the camera and the jeep that they are sitting in.

This was just to give you a sense of when that happened, and where that happened.

So these kinds of things were used.

I mean the same tea-guy is there in the Vijay Sethupathi sequence where he is taking Rasukutty and walking through the busy marketplace. You can see the tea guy right behind Vijay Sethupathi.

Hence these kinds of decisions about common locations and certain minor characters overlapping – were decided during the shoot. Major decisions like Berlin, the wayward police officer, being part of two stories – those things were decided while writing.

The only question that was left unanswered was – who wrote what?

But then, why do I even need to know that?

It’s only after watching the film three-four times, that I am forcing myself to ask such senseless questions. When I first saw it, I thought it was the work of a single writer. It was so seamlessly knit together. 

ALL OF US WROTE IT, IN BITS AND PIECES

 

See about who wrote which part, I have never revealed that to people, though they have been assumptions. And Mysskin has openly said that he has written the part where he plays the character – but even in that track you wouldn’t know which part he had written and which parts was written by me.

Those are the things that I wanted to keep hidden; to keep the curiosity alive.

Also, to be very honest, in most of the parts in the stories of one writer, there were contributions of other writers. Like Nalan may have contributed to the part that Mysskin had written and Mysskin has contributed to some parts that were written by me – mostly unknowingly. The same thing goes for Neelan.

When I had re-written all those tracks – I took the suggestions given by other writers. And not that they knew much about the other stories. But when I spoke to them about certain characters, or about one particular moment, they had certain reactions and I thought, okay, that’s a good idea and I should just put it somehow in the story and that has happened.

So it is kind of difficult to say who wrote which part – because it not 100% that writer’s part – including mine.

So it is safe to say that all of us have written it in bits and pieces, but, unknowingly or knowingly we have contributed to all the stories.  

On that note of creative camaraderie, for today, I would call it a day.

Reading and learning about the unique process of scripting of the film, and that too from the lead horse’s mouth, excited me a lot, since I thought delving deep into this might help me write an interlinked story-line of my own. At least that’s what I wanted to do when I approached Kumararaja for this blog post.

That’s also why I intended to limit this post to scripting.  

Samantha in Kumararaja film Super Deluxe
The look on your face when you find your ex-lover dead on your bed, and in your mind, could also hear your husband’s bike, returning home … priceless

In my next post, in a couple of days, I will focus on the other creative aspects of the storytelling of Super Deluxe, like visual design, sound and editing – and yes, the extraordinary ‘lived-in’ feel of its sets, brought to life by intelligent art direction.

All from a storytellers outlook, for my fellow screenwriters and film-enthusiasts.

Much has been discussed in the past one year, I agree, but not from this perspective; believe me, there’s a lot left for you and me to talk about there; and to learn.  

But if you have seen Super Deluxe, you already know that, don’t you?

Watch this and tell me…with a promo like this, how can you afford not to watch the film…?

Please follow and like:
Published inVIEWS

7 Comments

    • ANIRBAN B ANIRBAN B

      Thanks for commenting Prosenjit. The next is part 2 of the same film, and it will be published soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram